• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Training4cyclists

Cycling Training Tips

  • About
  • Cycling Training Programs
  • Case Studies
  • Cycling Training Tips

watts

How To Optimize Your Aerodynamic Position Using a Power Meter

May 14, 2009 by Jesper Bondo Medhus 5 Comments

If you are a time trialist or triathlete one of the benefits using a power meter is that it enables you to optimize your aerodynamics. Better position on the bike supplied with aerodynamic equipment can help you to save seconds or even minutes in a time trial.

Now I will show how you can use a power meter to optimize aero position on your bike through a simple testing procedure.

Wind tunnel aero testing: Gold standard but expensive

Wind tunnel tests are referred to as the gold standard of optimization of aerodynamics.

These wind tunnel tests are expensive and therefore we only see professional riders use these tests to optimize their position on their aero bikes. It’s logic that professional riders have a great advantage being able to do wind tunnel testing. Often it is only the classement-riders who get the chance to do these tests due to the high cost.

Don’t worry, here comes the good news. A power meter can help you optimize your aerodynamic position without ever visiting a wind tunnel or spending extra money!

Power meter: Great performance and affordable

If you are the lucky owner of a power meter like SRM or PowerTap you can perform your own aerodynamic tests. It’s essential to have a precise measuring of power output.

Currently I think SRM and Powertap are the two best power meters on the market. Using cheaper and less precise power meters is not recommended. If you don’t have a power meter, then buy one or try to borrow one.

A power meter is the single best investment for a serious rider who wants to improve performance. The fact that it enables you to make aerodynamic testing, precise analysis of power output in races and training situations and finally is a solid training partner/coach makes the power meter an easy choice.

Best of all, the power meter presents objective data that are not influenced by weather, hydration, stress or any of the many parametres that affect your heart rate.

Use a power meter to optimize aero equipment

Maybe you remember how I last summer used a power meter to investigate how much bike weight costs on Alpe d’Huez? The U23 rider who performed these trials had to maintain a power output around 275w on all four rides up Alpe d’Huez. The test bike was a Pinarello Prince equipped with Shimano Dura Ace and SRM crank.

Afterwards I could compare the finishing times to see what price you pay if you carry extra weight. It’s obvious that you can make more precise trials than we did here, but it shows the principle of using a power meter to optimize your equipment.

Thus, after these trials we had a picture of how much weight matters in the Alps.

When you ride up Alpe d’Huez, aerodynamics don’t play a big role because you ride relatively slowly. In time trials the speed is much higher and many serious riders perform average speeds above 40km/hr.

Thus, optimization of aerodynamics should be the major concern if you want to improve performance without spending more time struggling with your threshold power.

Find a good location

You will need a circuit where you can ride fast and still maintain a constant speed/power output. This is best done on a velodrome.

The main principle is to eliminate everything that is not related to aerodynamic drag. That is why wind tunnel testing of cyclists has become the golden standard procedure. Nevertheless, outdoor testing is still important because that is where you are going to compete when you race (corners, small hills etc.)

If you don’t have a velodrome in your neighbourhood then you have to be a little creative to make a good course for your tests. It’s still possible, but there are more factors that can influence on your ride. Though, it gets more difficult to show small differences.

Write a protocol

Write down all the tests and numbers you want to collect and in which order. That could be the different aerodynamic materials you would like to test and/or different body positions on your bike.

It’s a good idea to start with a standard upset of your bike e.g. Standard frame + standard equipment + standard body position. When you want to test different set-ups, change only one parameter at the time. Otherwise it gets difficult to identify what set-up change actually resulted in reduced aerodynamic drag.

Make two rides of 1-3km with each set-up. The more rides you do, the better chance you get to show a small significant difference.

Constant power output method

When you ride on a flat road with a constant power output differences in speed are primarily due to your aerodynamics. If you decide to use the constant power output method, you have to keep your power output as constant as possible and keep your desired aerodynamic position on your bike.

When you have finished one lap on your circiut, notice your average speed and power output. Hopefully you get power outputs there are so close to each other that differences in average speed can be accepted as due to altered aerodynamics.

Constant speed method

When you ride on a flat road with a constant speed, differences in required power output are primarily due to your aerodynamics.

If you decide to use the constant speed method, you have to keep your speed as constant as possible and keep your desired aerodynamic position on your bike. As you can see, this method is much the same as the constant power output method.

The difference is that you here try to keep average speed so close to each other that any difference in power output can be considered due to altered aerodynamics.

Constant power output or speed?

Decide whether you use constant wattage or constant speed method. Both are good methods, but if I have to pick one I will choose the constant speed method. I recommend it because it gives you the possibility to use an iPod in your ear to keep a constant pedalling frequency.

When you’ve found the right gear combination, this little trick makes it easier for you to ride at the decided speed in all tests. You just follow the rhythm from the music just like when you are at a spinning lesson. Thus you can concentrate 100% on holding your aerodynamic position on your bike.

Riding at speeds close to your race speed is the most optimal since it is here you can see how many watts it’s possible to save. There is, however, a little risk that the workouts with standard setups can become quite hard intervals. This will not happen with the constant power output method.

If you use the constant power output method there is a risk that you loose focus on holding your aero position. The positive thing is that the result is directly shown as increased speed/saved seconds.

Thus you can immediately see how much faster you will go if put on e.g. an aero helmet instead of your standard helmet.

Collecting data

It’s a good idea to have an assistant to help you e.g. your cycling coach, a friend or family member to keep track of the data stream. Assistants can be helpful throughout the whole process.

As I said previously we need data from two rides with each setup at a speed close to race speed. Doing tests with a distance of 1 to 3km gives you a fair chance to notice significant changes in aerodynamics.

I recommend that you do more of these tests instead of longer tests because weather conditions might influence on the results (temperature, changing winds).

It is also recommended to do a few tests at lower speeds e.g. 80 and 90% of race speed. This increases the power of your data and gives you the chance to spot trends at an early stage.

Analysis of aerodynamics

This is the really interesting part of this process since this is where you find out what works for you. You will be amazed how much time you can save with an optimized body position on your bike. Also you have the chance to figure out how much time can be saved if you use a rear disc wheel.

Remember to look at both material and body position savings because they can add up. I know that it is expensive to buy aero gear for your time trial bike, but using the principles above you can find out where you get the best value (watts or seconds) for money.

Share power meter data

Feel free to share your experiences with the readers here at Training4cyclists.com. If you have some interesting observations, let us hear about them. How many watts did you save using the principles described above?

Conclusion

There are many benefits of using a power meter. It enables you to do aerodynamic testing without extra cost and still offers a qualified alternative to an expensive wind tunnel test.

Doing aerodynamic tests using a power meter can help you to optimize your aerodynamic position on your time trial bike and/or selecting the right combination of aerodynamic wheels/frame/helmet etc.

How much time does extra weight cost on Alpe d’Huez?

July 30, 2008 by Jesper Bondo Medhus 36 Comments

Ever wondered how much difference it would make if you made your bike lighter? I guess most serious riders once in while have concerns about their bikes whether they are light enough. As previously described the bike weight has impact on performance ”“ especially during climbing.

Thus, I thought it was interesting to find out how much difference it makes if you ride a heavier bike up alpe d’Huez. This little trial was performed by the best rider I coach as a part of his preparation for Tour de l’avenir (U23 Tour de France) in September 2008.

In this experiment he had to ride up Alpe d’Huez four times with different setups. He was supposed to keep a pace around 275w on all four rides. The test bike was a Pinarello Prince equipped with Shimano Dura Ace and SRM crank:

1. Normal bike + 1.8L extra water in tyres(!)
This setup was quite interesting and got quite a lot of attention the day before when he had a puncture..! It was possible to fill 900ml into each tyre. Reducing weights on wheels is more important than reducing weight on non-rolling equipment e.g. bike saddle.

2. Normal bike + 1,8L extra water on bike.
This setup also got some serious attention because he rode a relative fast pace compared to most riders visiting Alpe d’Huez. Thus, when he performed the trial, well-trained riders were trying to keep up with his pace because this setup looked so extreme.

3. Normal bike
This setup was a completely normal bike.

4. Normal bike, reduced tyre pressure only 3 bars.
The last setup was ridden with reduced tyre pressure to 3bars. This was a tough finish on the last ride up Alpe d’Huez this day.

Results:
1. 52.01, 275w
2. 51.34, 277w
3. 49.40, 278w
4. 50.38, 273w

1,8L extra weight costs 1.54min up Alpe d’Huez. This is a remarkable test that shows us how important weight savings are when you are riding on steep hills. Also it shows that weight savings on wheels might be more important than weight saving on non-rolling equipment. These trials were only possible because of his SRM Crank that made it possible to compare each ride up the hill. You can make similar trials to test your bike setup if you want to optimize your bike equipment. These tests can be extremely helpful for e.g. time trialists if you don’t have wind tunnel in the neighbourhood.

Maximum power output or watts per kilogram?

July 10, 2008 by Jesper Bondo Medhus 1 Comment

Today is the first stage in Tour de France 2008 with big mountains. This is always an exciting stage to watch because it is the first really indication of who will be able to win the yellow jersey. Nevertheless, we will very likely only find out who will NOT be able to win the yellow jersey today.

But it should certainly be interesting to watch.

You will probably hear the commentators talk about the skill climbing and maybe also a bit more technical about how many watts each rider has performed in tests before the Tour de France this year.

Watts the problem?

It seems like there are two values when people discuss power outputs: Watts and watts per kilogram. The first one is an absolute value that predicts performance in flat races while the second one is often used to predict performance on hills.

Watts per kilogram is often used as a more sophisticated way to present physical performance because it represents a power output that is relative to your body weight. Experienced riders already know that when you climb, body weight matters.

Thus, additional fat stores are more expensive to carry on mountain stages than on flat stages.

Watts per kilogram the golden standard?

Watts per kilogram is often a better indicator of overall performance than absolute watts. But it is not as precise predictor of performance as it could be. With some simple adjustments it would give you a better picture of how you will perform.

What I am talking about is making some values that give the body weight slightly less impact when you predict climbing performance and add some impact to your body weight when you predict time trial performance.

It all depends…

The reason for these modifications is because climbing results cannot be predicted by watts per kilogram only. The problem appears when small riders achieve greater values in watts per kilogram, but don’t win the mountain stages. This can be explained by the fact that the external weight of the bike is carried by the rider independently of body size and several other factors that influence on overall performance e.g. gradient, wind resistance and tactics.

Thus, it is not possible to simplify the prediction of performance by using the metric watts per kilogram. Yes, that is definitively one of the best predictors we have, but it can be optimized with some modification and other factors should also be at least considered.

Watts per kilogram^X would possible be a better predictor of performance because there are no events that can be predicted accurately by watts or watts per kilogram only. Body weight will always play a role and normally play the biggest role in the mountains (X closer to 1).

Also it is worth to remember that body weight influences on time trial performance even though it is not very important in flat time trials with a constant high race velocity (X closer to 0).

Optimize your cycling training with basic knowledge

May 3, 2008 by Jesper Bondo Medhus 1 Comment

Cycling training should not be made more difficult than it already is. Consider how many cyclists who have won great races, championships and honour without knowing anything significant about cycling training principles, nutrition or training planning (not to mention heart rate monitors, power meters etc.) There are a lot athletes having success, because they have talent and do a lot of clever things without knowing it: They train hard, they rest and they eat proper amounts of food.

Thus, they make above 95% of their potential performance by doing these things right. Advanced training methods can only add a few watts to this, but in tough competitions these can be crucial. But for a beginning it can be valuable to read these articles to avoid the most common mistakes and understand the basic principles of high quality cycling training:

Recovery Tips for Cyclists

Basic Principles of Cycling Training

Heart Rate Monitor Training Mistakes

Strength Training Mistakes

Expert Tips on How to Analyze Your Power Meter Files

April 8, 2008 by Jesper Bondo Medhus 5 Comments

Here is an interview with Dirk Friel who is a co-founder of TrainingPeaks.com. One of his jobs is to help professional riders and coaches to analyze data from power meters. Since one of the biggest topics here on Training4cyclists.com is power meter training, it is a pleasure to get some additional info from one of the experts into analyzing of power meter files. This interview is quite long, but I hope you enjoy it, there are several good points waiting for you!

Training4cyclists.com: “I guess many pro riders have a SRM or PowerTap mounted (at least to look a bit serious) as a part of their bike equipment, but I’m not sure how many of these riders actually spend time analyzing their performances. Dirk, you have been working with several pro riders so how will you describe their look on power meter training?”

Dirk Friel: “It seems today’s pro’s either embrace technology and will do anything to leverage the latest advances in hardware and software to their benefit, or they resist the new school of thought and hold onto the traditional ways of training. Some pros ride with a power meter just to give the illusion they are analyzing their performances, when in fact they’ve never actually taken the time to download their power meter.

I try to get riders into the routine of downloading and saving files daily as part of their job. Call me crazy, but if you are being paid to ride a bike you should take it seriously and not waste your time. There is immense value in collecting and analyzing data over time. Maybe even more value than analyzing files daily. Spotting the historical trends and manipulating future training to take advantage of those trends is of huge benefit to those who take the time.”

Training4cyclists.com: “One of the athletes you have been working with is Levi Leipheimer. He performs well in time trials and during climbing, but how did you help him to develop these skills and how do you track his progress?”

Dirk Friel: “Let me clarify. I do not coach Levi and I don’t prescribe his training. That is the job of legendary coach Massimo Testa. My job is as a consultant to Massimo and Levi so they can analyze and view reports which track Levi’s progress. We’ve created reports within TrainingPeaks which are in essence a dashboard that compares this year’s data to last year’s. This provides a daily snapshot which quantifies Levi’s fitness, fatigue and overall form.

Levi can also spot when he sets new personal best records which directly affect his training intensity as performed in intervals. Levi is truly on the cutting edge of training analysis and is leveraging technology to gain an edge. TrainingPeaks is also the data management system which allows Massimo and Levi to efficiently monitor, analyze and plan training and racing.”

Training4cyclists.com: “When you analyze results from a stage race, what key points do you look for in the power meter file?”

Dirk Friel: “There are a number of things a power meter can show you, but it all depends on the rider and their goals within the stage race. One rider may be trying to conserve energy during a stage, while another is trying to be aggressive or work for the team.

One of the primary metrics we track is a value called Training Stress Score (TSS). The Training Stress Score is essentially a way of assigning a value to a ride to quantify the amount of work performed, relative to the individual’s threshold power. The TSS value can give the athlete an indication of how well they may recover for the next day and beyond. Because TSS is directly tied to the individual’s threshold power comparing the TSS value between two riders is a good way of seeing which rider may have worked more than another. This is also very valuable when teaching young riders how to improve as a stage racer since the better stage racers know how to conserve energy for the crucial stages.”

Training4cyclists.com: “Pro riders who are going to make top performance in time trials often visit a wind tunnel to optimize their aerodynamic position. Lots of readers here on training4cyclists.com are serious about their performance in time trials, but don’t have the opportunity to save seconds in this expensive way. What would you recommend them to do to make their aerodynamics better?”

Dirk Friel: “With my little knowledge of aerodynamics I can only advise getting a time trial helmet and aerodynamic wheels. I’m not an aero-dynamic specialist but I do advise riders get a yearly bike fit which has direct benefits when it comes to economy and the ability to time trial well. Racing with a power meter is also of great benefit for those riders who are still learning pacing strategies. Most riders start out too fast and blow up the second half of a TT. Proper pacing can dramatically improve your time trials.

Beyond that it comes down to flexibility to hold an aero position and targeted workouts to improve your muscular endurance, anaerobic power, strength and economy. Improving strength, flexibility and simply riding more in the TT position are probably the most under-rated ways to improve your time trialing.”

Training4cyclists.com: “Training hard and dedicated is important, but reducing the amount of training before a big event is also a major concern. The perfect tapering protocol is a topic many riders works on for many years. Peaking at the right moment at the championship or specific stage race should not be based on a lot of random factors, so heart rate and power meter data files offer a great opportunity to increase the success ratio of such projects. I guess you won’t show us the specific tapering protocol from
one of the Tour de France heroes, but can you describe the basic principles you use to calculate peak performance when you analyze data files?”

Dirk Friel: “There are three basic metrics you need to track and be aware of”“ fitness, fatigue and form. In general we all know what these are, but most riders don’t do a good job of managing, or objectifying them. A power meter with the proper software can allow the rider to track these metrics daily. The perfect taper will allow for the maintenance of your race-intensity fitness, reduce fatigue and allow the form to rise. I find
that most pros don’t allow themselves enough recovery time and therefore show up to important events with too much fatigue. It is hard for most riders to back off and allow fatigue to drop and their form to rise. It simply doesn’t matter how fit you are on race day, if your fatigue is higher than your fitness level then you won’t perform at your true potential.

This is why a power meter along with TrainingPeaks software can be so valuable. The TrainingPeaks Performance Management Chart will allow any cyclist with a power meter to track accumulated workloads over time and graphically view fitness, fatigue and form levels. Once you can do this it becomes a whole lot easier to taper and peak.”

Training4cyclists.com: “Planning a tapering protocol is also about looking in the mirror to see what has happened in the past. TrainingPeaks WKO+ offers a feature to measure acute and chronic stress. How will you describe this feature and how is it calculated?”

Dirk Friel: “Chronic Training Load (CTL) and Acute Training Load (ATL) are the technical terms for fitness and fatigue. The last remaining piece to track is form which is also known as Training Stress Balance (TSB). To calculate the three metrics (CTL, ATL, TSB) the rider needs to first track daily Training Stress Score values. We then take the 42-day rolling average of daily TSS to calculate CTL, 7-day rolling average of daily TSS for ATL and the difference between CTL and ATL is the Training Stress Balance.

Training Stress Balance is what the athlete wants to see rise as their highest priority event approaches. Ideally CTL, or fitness, is near the highest of the season and ATL, fatigue, is low in order to have the form rise.

The screen shot of Silence-Lotto’s Mario Aerts Performance Management Chart which shows his CTL (in blue), ATL (pink), and TSB (yellow) between January and March 2007. You can see his TSB rose to its highest levels as he entered the Belgium classics season, which is exactly what he wanted. The three spikes in ATL are races in Australia in January, then a hard training camp and finally the third spike is the Tour of California.”

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

E-books

Time Effective Cycling Training

12-Week Winter Training Program

Footer

Case studies and experiments

Bronze Medal at 3K Pursuit World Championships with Only 10 Hrs/Week

The Story Behind the 12-Week Winter Training Program

How to Become Stronger Without Adding Muscle Mass

How Much Does Extra Weight Cost on Alpe d’Huez?